13 reasons, why polygamy would be useful to human company. Be correct in agreement or doesn\'t agree?

Here going.

If company took part in polygamist relationships,...

1. It wthere is ürde, much lower numbers of single rooms, frustrated and lonesome men and women in company: Women, who divide the husband and the men, who must compete no more over women. WeilWeil she/it in the household so much has.

2. None of eagernessüchtigen, uncertain girl friends, who try to ruin a good marriage, more: if he/it has multiple women. You/they können all any others girlfriend within the marriage is. Therefore, they don\'t have any Bedürfnis, to have a bouquet of friends outside the marriage, that could become jealous on the Ehen-Glück.

3. No parent more turns towards less theück: More and more, households would have in the at home with the children a father and a mother. So, they place auf\'t been lifted by the computer, video game or tv.

4. Less Promiskuität: Men and women will go out less and will have throws, a night of stnads and so on, because they have somebody at home to go to it. Also wäre no man with a woman, except if he/it promises to take back her/it/them with him/it home and to make his/its wife for her/it/them.

5. No more egoistic individual women, that by married Männern lusts,: you knows the totals
Select woman; "You/they are fixed and ripe and have all matters, that I need, WITH another WOMAN! But I want you anyway"
Man married; "Hmm good, because you want me so badly, because I spare am justified. Why places auf\'t that you meet my wife?" Simply, NO!?!

6. Wealth and schcorrode, you increase exponentially: If you have all earning of any money a household with 3 or 4 adults. You/they könnten
A., you bring in more incomes
B., you oust all her/its/their debts/liabilties and
C. besides particular money for supplies, vacations, savings and so on

7. Lower Scheidung-rates/less-Belastung: the women becomes on one, hand wants to be cooperative in taking worry of her/its/their husband, but on the other hand if itself a woman uncomfortable doing fühlte, something, which she/it, under pressure, could not feel, placed in order to make ihn/es. Because she/it weiß, one of the other women may gladly even do it. In monogamous relationships. The woman or hält lives, feeling placed under pressure, in order to do matters, that don\'t enjoy her/it/them maybe in order to please her/its/their partner. The husband is less likely to go, because he/it weiß, could be ready at least one of the women, that to do for him/it something he/it needs/wants.

8. Less infedility: Männer obviously places auf\'t must feel dizzy. You/they have multiple women at home, that can keep him/it and everyone, that are glad in multiple other ways. Therefore, he/it feels him/it no Bedürfnis, to get something, \'s that is missing at home. The women are not likely to feel dizzy because she/it
Have the company of the other women A. and
Wants to disturb B. the positivity in the home maybe, not.
Do you notice a husband like the women ever feels dizzy with it, is not as beautiful as the woman? But she/it makes the matters, that the woman won, \'t!
Do you, as the men, with which women feel dizzy, notice ever is not, how justifies or has as much money for the husband? But he/it hört you to and cares about her/its/their feelings!
People seem, her/its/their partner doesn\'t make anything, in order to bring her/it/them to it, to feel dizzy, because they feel, to feel good!

9. If a mother dies soon after child birth, the baby can natis still nurtured ürlich: If a Mrs. Geburt gives and dies after it tragically soon, the father now is through himself, he/it rejects to feed the baby formula because not es\'s of course. What he/it then makes nat for the babyürliche milk to feed?
If he/it was in a polygamist relationship, everything is, which would happen, this of the other women would start to then nurse the nourishing of the baby as if it is she/it own. , you think thereover after,

10. More freedom: Because the women and the man, who have in the home all others charge. All wäre finally so well busy worry, that they all finally would reach a point, where they have special energy and time to do matters, that they like to do. As in "More people share the family duties evenly = matters is made more efficient = more fun time for everything.

11. No more over dependence on government. social programs. : Live insurance, health insurance, care würde during the night and so on, you are become obsolete. First, this family system is etsablished, that she/it special funds hätten, worry, time, energy in the family., to repair themsleves about problems, instead of to rely on government.

12. No more babysitters/daycare: Dort\'s, that always goes, to be a woman at home, that the children know. Therefore no Bedürfnis after daycare, baby babysitters, that takes care of your children, STRANGER!

13. Völker-Mentalitätsbesserungen: Populate, becomes riper in general, gives more, more affectionate and more responsible becomes. Sie\'wieder the single matters, that they help the family, müssen. No government. Help or programs. No more arrested development!!!
"It takes a village in order to pull up a child"

Is 13 reasons here, why I believe, that polygamy would be a benefit to company.

The question now is. Be correct in agreement or doesn\'t agree?
If you also think, company would be of use to this, state why please.
If not, also state why.

Thanks.

Additional details

Acade: I must say that you have a good point. There are parts of the world like China, where the Männer unfortunately outnumber the women does. Therefore in this part of the world it wouldn\'t is much of one Möglichkeit at all. Hmmm.

But we die densely populated men in the majority of the world and in larger numbers earlier. Therefore für the majority I believes you, that it would be primarily useful.

You/they produce also another good argument. There is Männer and women in company, that never marries or wants to land, \'t-Gefühl ready for it still. Never said, thereß it perfect was. I get only the Gefühl, if it was directly settled, that better than what it would finish to be, we now have. Hmmmm.

To Nobodyan:

1. A. you got a good point. Möglich that ich\'m, he/it simplifies human nature too strongly?
B., why does this person like only this child and not the whole neighborhood?

2. I imagine, thereß the multiple incomes type of matters for those slowly could be put together. And Sie\'d is surprise over how much money, can be together poled and between 3 or 4 grown-ups can save, you populate in a household.

3. You/they looks at way I it. It wäre a spin. It würde always an adult in the home, that would be no one of the adults, that live together, gives. If is with her/its/their works in two, weras the others two at home and turned back. If three from Lebensmitteleinkäufen or the work is or trains. It würde still gives an adult at home and turned back. Essentially wäre the child/children ever never through itself at home. I think.

Too olds-Kühle: Hello, the polygamists in America essentially are, rich men don\'t work, who are women,"

Where did you hear or did this read? I würde gladly more on the topic searches. I find so interestingly.

Peaces.

Too nobodyan:

14. I place beleive auf\'t, the schön or only for the man even possible would be to be been working. The type of situation of ich\'m introducing is one where the man and the women are all brining in incomes, that first für the whole family is spent!

Oh and if anybody notices multiple posts in the additional details. Sometimes, YA acts and announces multiple times to my newest comment. , Very much annoying itself,

To Rosh: It would be really really helpful if you could station some sources and a nach-links/references in order to support your claim.

Thanx.

"O.K., the biggest question is here. Why? Why würden, a woman or women, does income, everything, choose to be with a man, who must share his/its time, with other women?"

I assume that the women detain friends with each other, wanted, would not have to about jealousy, the action or the dizziness, provides and enjoys to have multiple incomes instead of struggling to pay bills alone. An inquiry to you. Reckon how much they earn würden, if they did something like it? And there how many editions weras? Simply curious.

"This is not of use at all to her/it/them.", How do you know? Sie\'wieder simply speculates you, I am.

"It would be a much simpler life if it was a man, a woman and her/its/their children together. Not his/its harem of the women and dozen of stepkids. Not only, thereß, but the children would be of use more of two parents homes because they get more attention from HER/ITS/THEIR OWN PARENTS. You/they let dedicated only time to them if the parents placed into the effort, and not a whole classroom of the children

from Sashaaaa:,

Best answer chosen by Asker

Don\'t agree. Financially, es\'s a nightmare situation.

1. People have other values, and beliefs, thereß she/it into her/its/their children wants to instill. You/they want, thereß her/its/their children a certain way is lifted, they want the privilege to nurse her/its/their own child. Not the whole neighborhood..
2. As a father würden you enough income, to support about X-Menge of children, does? I understand, thereß you wouldn\'t is the single provider, but does this view... this something over college? Trust funds? Clothing? Eats? Vacation? Accommodating? Child care?
3. Sie\'wieder, to essentially say 1 women, m,üßte all these children daily immediately likes. Think thereover after... who it, that supports, she/it? If I want you, over this, the most TWO-Elternteil, that households hardly have enough, the average 3 children, can you introduce yourself, populate to leave multiples (the counterpart to opinion, 3 pairs,), that live together, 6 people, living with 9 children, and a person, who not even works, in a house, to support, to think, carefully? How will you handle this?
4. About not too erwähnen, you accommodate maintenance, you falsify auto insurance visits, IMPORTANT health insurance prices, taxes, household bills, if sie\'wieder older, CARS, you travel costs, education, if and so on private,..

vvvv that I agree. What, if only the man working wäre? It wouldn\'t is möglich, to take care of 14 other people, except if he/it made over $100,000 healthy annually. Also, that something if do the women, who were working, find you another type? One single type, with no family, a QUIET, peaceful home, that wants to calm down with her, and she/it single? You/they place \'t aufglaubt, thereß she/it with this offer would jump?

O.K., the biggest question is here. Why? Why würden, a woman or women, does income, everything, choose to be with a man, who must share his/its time, with other women? This doe nützt you at all not. It wäre a much simpler life, if it was a man, a woman and her/its/their children together. Not his/its harem of the women and dozen of stepkids. Not only, thereß, but the children would be of use more of two parents homes because they get more attention from HER/ITS/THEIR OWN PARENTS. You/they let dedicated only time to them if the parents placed into the effort, and not a whole classroom of the children. I believe, thereß a child in a less chaotic home glad would be.
B. because a parents child relationship is one of the most important relationships, you refine in lives. Es\'s Ihr beginning, your foundation.

2. What wit guarantees ürde that these adults do a considerable income? Minimum according to tariff isn\'t gonna cuts it, and working part-time is not any M eitheröglichkeit, for the spin theory, you have. Therefore, für your idea, to have any shot when working, you, \'d needs women decently to bring enough money home in order to support this lifestyle, that I question HIGH things a wife, that 4 years or was so long to college, trained college, will go for it.

Asker \'s Comment:: Nobodyan, that your answer wins.
However, Facade is second you per end, the explaine dyour-Sichten improve, I think.
Also to nobodyan, maybe I am wrong, but you seem a little one, agitated through this question?
I am no difficult polygamy myself. , To know ICH\'m simply curiously, whether most people lowermostützen would become, everything is it.That.

Thanx. :)

Save to! ! RSS Sashaaaa:, yes, wäre I a become one agitates small, because I know, some types actually would try this, and the women, who agree with him/it, are fools.

Report abuse

Source(s,:

There is not to marry any advantage over a man.

from Louise\'s C no, I don\'t agree.

if a man has a number of women, for a beginning, he/it must be very prosperous, how will he/it support the offspring of multiple women? Even if the women are working, he/it, \'s, begets her/it still many children, is he/it not? Like many Mthese costs can actually afford änner? and has, he/it got the time and the energy to give to all this parenting?

And will he/it be capable, them everything, to satisfy? he/it will have otherwise many frustrated ladies.

And something over the men, who cannot get any women, because much is she/it a small number of men hogging? dort\'s that goes much beyelet, to be frustrated men around. Don\'t vergißt that in animal species, where men have wives,the-Männer multiple with harems, invests you a dreadful quantity of time and energy of it, from competition ambitious individual men, to provide.

Moreover, women often don\'t pull together this whole well in polgamous-Gesellschaften at, there is much arguing, the husbands will be jealousy and so on capable to cope with it?

Moreover, women constantly have lower statuses in companies, that allow polygamous marriage. I würde to polygamy, that is therefore legalized in western company, is opposed strongly.

But there is not actually anything, in order to stop the life a man with several women, if he/it can persuade her/it/them that this is a good idea. Which I place auf\'t believe, thereß it is.

through old coolness for those, that claims, that no polygamy natural"-ist, it is not. Pair gangs are. ONLY rich Männer had the luxury of multiple women.

I read it, but always not what. I am not correct in agreement.
I don\'t see actually be she/it in the USA for those polygamists rich. That was a stupid point. MOST polygamists, who put on the women, \'t works ouchßer, that ONE is, at home the single doing each money.

through Meagan Loves Bliss! As Facade pointed it out, the main problem with it is the number of Männern opposite women. It würde many lonesome men with NO women give because other men have multiple women. Ohßer if polyandry is also a possibility, polygamy is no good idea in company in general.

Source(s,:

I don\'t have anything against people, that polygamous his/its wants, it simply is not good if ALL decide to assume multiple women!

until springs, your logic seems not to fit our reality.

The countries don\'t worry, that allow polygamy, that it is miserable for women. Her/its/their laws show, thereß she/it lands, \'t estimates the opinions of the women.

The countries, that allow polygamy, have more need of government programs and welfare far, her/its/their people are normally poor. Polygamy zerstört the economy, in that she/it keeps locked up women. You/they become a ware to valuable, about her/it/them freely, to leave and to take part in the economy, is.

And on and on.

Because of his/its low class hid answer

Polygamy is natural. People like all apes are polygamous.

adult breastfeeding

Monday 18 July 2011